Strippers & Hairdressers

//Strippers & Hairdressers

Strippers & Hairdressers

The California Supreme Court’s landmark decision

The California Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Dynamex Operations West v. Superior Court, 4 Cal. 5th 903 (2018) drastically limited the types of employees who could lawfully be independent contractors.

Less than a year later, there have been real-world effects on industries like hairdressing, trucking, and…. Stripping.  Yes, stripping.

Many exotic dancers had been working as independent contractors rather than as employees. But last week, the Los Angeles Times reported that the Dynamex decision has removed strippers’ ability to choose whether they want to remain independent contractors. LA Times Story

ABC TestGavel and books

Under Dynamex’s new “ABC” test, workers in a variety of industries can no longer simply decide that they want to be independent contractors.  To be an independent contractor, a worker (A) must be free from the hirer’s “control and direction,” (B) must perform work “that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business,” and (C) must ordinarily work in the trade for which his or her services are sought.

Factor “B” is the most radical departure from the previous legal standard.  It means that a business owner – including, apparently, owners of gentlemen’s clubs – must treat the workers who work in their usual business – the dancers – as employees.  This means they now owe payroll taxes for these employees and must comply with California laws regarding wages, overtime, and meal and rest breaks.

While the stated goal of Dynamex was to protect workers, many workers will end up earning less, as the Los Angeles Times reported.  And workers in industries like exotic dancing may have less control over their work, which makes them less protected. The article quoted Stormy Daniels (yes, that Stormy Daniels), who expressed in an op-ed in the Los Angeles Times that if strippers were forced to become employees, “employers might require use to give free nude performances to customers we don’t feel comfortable with.”  Yet not all exotic dancers agree; some wish to go further and unionize, the article reported.

Recent Post

Uber Lyft Assembly Bill 5 (AB5)

How Assembly Bill 5 (AB5) Will Affect Independent Contractors in 2020

Gov. Gavin Newsom recently signed legislation, Assembly Bill 5 (AB5), into law which, effective January 1, 2020, could potentially reclassify ...
Cindy Flynn

LISTEN: What’s New in California Employment Law for 2020?

I was invited as a guest on Exit Coach Radio to discuss the newest employment law changes for California employers ...
exterior view of McDonalds restaurant

McDonald’s Is Not Your Employer: An Overview of Joint Employment

In a class action brought forward by 1,400 McDonald’s employees in the Bay Area, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of ...
By |2019-05-20T18:30:16-08:00March 7th, 2019|Employment Law|

About the Author:

Ms. Flynn believes her attorneys and staff should come from a wide range of legal backgrounds and experience. She provides a workplace that is team-oriented and works together to bring the best results to her clients.